<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.info/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Alan Cresswell's Unified Theory Discussion Forum</title>
  <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Alan Cresswell's Unified Theory Discussion Forum : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 8.04</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : Unexplored Faraday Field Effect</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=133#133</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Alan Cresswell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Unexplored Faraday Field Effect<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01 August 2008 at 9:28am<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by VORTEX</strong></em><br /><br />Hi Mr. Cresswell<BR><BR>Thanks for the starting drawing.&nbsp; Hope to get going on this as soon as I dig up the core material. I suppose this view is a section view of half the unit. Further questions:<BR><BR>Could a permanent magnet be substituted for the upper 0.58mm coil? <BR><BR>Is the&nbsp; 0.43 Tesla figure critical. Should the current be adjusted to get this exact value in the gap?<BR><BR>What kind of ferrous material would be preferred, soft steel, iron?<BR><BR>Cheers.....V<BR></div> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Permanent magnets could be used and 0.43 T is not critical. I made the coil 920 turns and gap 8 mm so that you would not need a fluxmeter.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I think any soft steel oK for tests.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=133#133</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : Unexplored Faraday Field Effect</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=132#132</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=60">VORTEX</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Unexplored Faraday Field Effect<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01 August 2008 at 3:32am<br /><br />Hi Mr. Cresswell<br><br>Thanks for the starting drawing.&nbsp; Hope to get going on this as soon as I dig up the core material. I suppose this view is a section view of half the unit. Further questions:<br><br>Could a permanent magnet be substituted for the upper 0.58mm coil? <br><br>Is the&nbsp; 0.43 Tesla figure critical. Should the current be adjusted to get this exact value in the gap?<br><br>What kind of ferrous material would be preferred, soft steel, iron?<br><br>Cheers.....V<br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by VORTEX - 01 August 2008 at 3:35am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=132#132</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : Unexplored Faraday Field Effect</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=131#131</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Alan Cresswell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Unexplored Faraday Field Effect<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 31 July 2008 at 10:53am<br /><br />Model start possibility<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><img src="http://unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/uploads/20080731_105243_Vince_start.gif" height="642" width="664" border="0" /></DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=131#131</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : Unexplored Faraday Field Effect</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=130#130</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Alan Cresswell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Unexplored Faraday Field Effect<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 31 July 2008 at 9:00am<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by VORTEX</strong></em><br /><br />Hi Mr. Cresswell<BR><BR>I would like to get started replicating something along the lines of the Unexplored Faraday Field Effect (diagram 3) or the iron core high temp. superconductor&nbsp; (diagram 17). <BR><BR>In the test for the Unexplored Faraday Field Effect you state "<FONT face=Verdana size=2>The effect is less than Faraday but now the windings are 100% efficient."<BR><BR>Could you expand on this? Is part of the efficiency the torque in the X and Z axis you mention?<BR><BR>You also state "</FONT><FONT face=Verdana size=2>This is probably the most important effect discussed here". Not sure of the reference, is it the "torque" that is the most important effect?</FONT><BR><BR>Can some research notes or a starting point be posted so I don't wrongly recreate the experiments?<BR><BR>Thanks in advance<BR><BR>Kindest Regards........V<BR></div> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>"the most important effect here" is the fact that a force is detected when Newton-Faraday says it is impossible.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Will send you a drawing to begin with for LCR self driving.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=130#130</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : SELF DRIVING RES&#079;NANCE</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3&amp;PID=129#129</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=60">VORTEX</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> SELF DRIVING RES&#079;NANCE<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 31 July 2008 at 4:27am<br /><br />Hello Mr. Cresswell<br><br>In a prior quote you stated:<br><br>"by the weekend I will open a new thread with three printablepages.&nbsp;They will give&nbsp;you absolutely everything you need to know aboutthe power of GRAVITY and the power cycle inside every atom in theuniverse. "<br><br>I cannot locate these pages. Can anyone direct me to them?<br><br>Thanks in advance........V<br><br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3&amp;PID=129#129</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : Unexplored Faraday Field Effect</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=128#128</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=60">VORTEX</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Unexplored Faraday Field Effect<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 31 July 2008 at 1:33am<br /><br />Hi Mr. Cresswell<br><br>I would like to get started replicating something along the lines of the Unexplored Faraday Field Effect (diagram 3) or the iron core high temp. superconductor&nbsp; (diagram 17). <br><br>In the test for the Unexplored Faraday Field Effect you state "<font face="Verdana" size="2">The effect is less than Faraday but now the windings are         100% efficient."<br><br>Could you expand on this? Is part of the efficiency the torque in the X and Z axis you mention?<br><br>You also state "</font><font face="Verdana" size="2">This         is probably the most important effect discussed here". Not sure of the reference, is it the "torque" that is the most important effect?</font><br><br>Can some research notes or a starting point be posted so I don't wrongly recreate the experiments?<br><br>Thanks in advance<br><br>Kindest Regards........V<br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by VORTEX - 31 July 2008 at 1:59am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=58&amp;PID=128#128</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=127#127</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=60">VORTEX</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 30 July 2008 at 2:13am<br /><br />Diagram 31 is the first diagram on the first post of "A 1000% Turbine Gain Addition"&nbsp; thread. It references a Pelton stage gain. I see now the note says the cups are stationary.<br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by VORTEX - 30 July 2008 at 2:23am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=127#127</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=126#126</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Alan Cresswell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29 July 2008 at 11:37am<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by VORTEX</strong></em><br /><br />James D. Hardy is supposedly working on a better video, with better lighting and views of the device in operation.<BR><BR>Perhaps we'll spot that magic flying pig.<BR><BR>By the way, is there any merit in a counter-rotating assembly using outer Pelton wheel and inner rotating nozzles ? Not sure if this is shown in drawing #31.<BR><BR>kind Regards<BR><BR>....V<BR></div> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Cannot recognise #31. Unified site drawing (4-1) is as concise as I can get it. I cannot see "merit" in changing it. It is simple, cheap and very, very powerful.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>It is a perfect demo model and proof of Quantum mass/light equilibrium.</DIV><DIV>Einstein ran away from it but this is for a modern 14 year old.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I went to N Carolina 7 days after 9/11. My host had a diesel driven generator in house.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I would like to have frame size and rpm of such devices. So far priming the drive rotor has been a nightmare but it can be done based on all the failures so far.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=126#126</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=125#125</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=60">VORTEX</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 July 2008 at 12:39pm<br /><br />James D. Hardy is supposedly working on a better video, with better lighting and views of the device in operation.<br><br>Perhaps we'll spot that magic flying pig.<br><br>By the way, is there any merit in a counter-rotating assembly using outer Pelton wheel and inner rotating nozzles ? Not sure if this is shown in drawing #31.<br><br>kind Regards<br><br>....V<br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by VORTEX - 28 July 2008 at 12:56pm</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=125#125</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>General Discussion : SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR</title>
   <link>http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=124#124</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Alan Cresswell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> SELF RUNNING PUMP + GENERATOR<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 July 2008 at 8:35am<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by VORTEX</strong></em><br /><br />I don't know if you have seen this:<BR><BR>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3577926064917175403&amp;q=future+of+energy&amp;ei=ZBKNSPzmA4SaqQLqpp29Cw<BR><BR>Note the title of the video is "Future of Energy" but the link shown may not point to that exact video, find it on the left screen, guy with a green shirt standing next to a plywood box. <BR><BR><BR>Supposedly self running pump plus Pelton wheel drives generator which after running up with line current is switched to self run mode from power output of generator. Somewhat crude construction, little attempt at optimizing the design.<BR><BR>The inventor, James D. Hardy, seen in the video, has been issued a US Patent #20070018461&nbsp; in the class of prime movers 290/54.<BR><BR>Any comments<BR><BR>.....V<BR></div> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I have viewed the Google patent copy. Mr Hardy is patenting&nbsp;a logic&nbsp;that insists that One large belt drive/One small belt drive = a free lunch.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>There is clearly a magic flying pig in there somewhere.</DIV><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Alan Cresswell - 28 July 2008 at 8:35am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=57&amp;PID=124#124</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>